top of page

Religion Controversies and Practices Has Resulted in Blood-Shed for Centuries! Know the Instances!

religious conflict, religious violence


“No one has to use the decision of God to dedicate violence,” Pope Francis stated at the Catholic University in Albania. “To kill within the call of God is a grave sacrilege. To discriminate inside the name of God is inhuman.”

The Pope’s feedback was geared towards terrorists who combat below the banner of Islam. He seems to say that individuals who use violence to similar religion aren’t appearing inaccurate, true religion but alternatively contrary to hooked up non-secular norms.

This can be understood as losing my religion. But that may be a long way from the case. Violence inside the call of faith has been a staple of human records. (True religion isn’t the best motive for violence. The 3 primary applicants for crimes in opposition to humanity in the twentieth century—Hitler, Stalin, and Mao—weren’t religiously endorsed.) True religion does not support any sort of violence. Realism thrives on peace and harmony and love for all. Justifying violence under the garb of ‘losing my religion is a sin.


But violence sanctified is deeply embedded in almost every true religion. Here are a few examples:


In the Jewish bible, God kills harmless Egyptian children to train the pharaoh a lesson. For true religion, it should not be a way of celebrating someone’s killing. But this is justified as it has been written in their realism.

For Jews, Hanukkah celebrates the success of the Maccabees in competition to the Seleucid Empire. In the 20th century, the Stern Gang, devoted to finishing the British Palestinian Mandate and commencing it to unrestricted immigration to Jews, described themselves as terrorists. Yitzhak Shamir, one of the leaders, said he determined thought inside the biblical tales of Gideon and Samson.


Christians waged crusades under the banner of true religion. Not best did they kill Muslims, however moreover they murdered other Christians over doctrinal subjects and unleashed centuries of systematic anti-Semitism. Later, Pilgrims and Puritans, who fled Europe because of non-secular persecution, installed violent and illiberal colonies in America, acting barbarically inside the name of Christian theology. St. Michael is the saint of the police and navy.


Islam hooked up its roots as a conquering army. Mohammed is respected as a prophet and well-known as a military chief. Shia and Sunni Muslims were killing every other for additional than 1,500 years, all inside the call of who rightly succeeds their true religion’s founder. Is this acceptable to kill your brothers in the name of true religion? This is not what the true religion of Islam says.


What is true religion greater in non-violence Buddhism? Yet, at some point in WWII, maximum Buddhist organizations in Japan supported their conflict efforts. This wasn’t the number one time that Buddhism supported violence.

During the sixteenth century, warrior monks rallied to the concept that “The mercy of Buddha want to be recompensed even via pounding flesh to quantities. One’s duty to the Teacher should be recompensed despite the resource of smashing bones to bits.”


Hinduism is built upon the principle of doing no damage. Yet, in 2008, Hindus attacked more than 20 Christian churches in southern India. At present, waging attacks on different communities under the garb of being ‘Dharm and Gow Rakshaks’ is not what true religion like Hinduism teaches.


When it involves political extremism and its intersection within the name of true religion, two extraordinary methods can be identified that do not intersect. According to the first one, which is pretty dominant in the media, true religion is an unbiased variable, which means that religion, in keeping with use in its doctrines and values, is a number one cause for global conflicts. This is a dominant belief; perhaps maximum strongly expressed in Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations thesis.


The hassle is that paying attention simplest to beliefs or spiritual texts does now not help us apprehend the imaginative and prescient and approach of Al-Qaeda or distinctive terrorist organizations. Additionally, there are double requirements due to the fact we do not now go to the bible to recognize some forms of political violence related to Christian religious companies.

Most teachers have moved far away from this number one approach and have a superior second one in which true religion is a proxy for the real factors contributing to political violence, which includes social or economic grievances, failed states, or outdoor political interferences. While those two tactics each have some use, they must no longer be seen as precise.

Scholars can keep away from the useless polarization implicit in selecting among those two techniques utilizing taking a wholly unique path and looking at the geographical region as a framework to recognize the politicization of true religions in considerable and Islam especially.


Taking this technique may nicely understand that cutting-edge collective identities have been original internal countrywide frameworks. In clean phrases, how we are saying “we” nowadays is the result of different layers of education and socialization in the unique vicinity referred to as the kingdom, which has modified all identities consisting of spiritual ones.

The countryside is, with the aid of definition, a secular political project that has converted all spiritual debates and values for people and society. There is a bent amongst Western students to have a look at true religion as a private affair because of the particular records of faith in Western Europe. But this has no longer usually been the case. Furthermore, even in Europe, it is not correct to view true religion strictly as a set of private beliefs within the moderate of contemporary tensions about the legitimacy of the hijab and burqa in public areas.


The number one function of the dominion is to adjust social behaviors in the countrywide community. Such law also can interfere with opportunity collective identities and the truth that people aren’t the best residents, however additionally part of cultural, ethnic, and spiritual groups.

As a result, conflicts can get up even as their “other” collective identities undertaking or do not healthy inside the proper social behaviors sanctioned with the aid of way of the kingdom and the national network. In this recognize, it is essential to go through in mind that true religion isn’t always the handiest belief but additionally belonging and behaving. ‘

Freedom from religion is also an acceptable philosophy. That is why de-radicalization programs that focus on converting ideals are generally no longer successful. Most radical corporations do not focus on notion but rather commonly tend to intensify the belonging and behaving dimensions of true religion.


This is especially putting in the case of ISIS. The Islamic State has the ambition to alter people’s behaviors like every totalitarian country. It does not care what people keep in mind. What is crucial is that citizens/believers want to act definitely in the public sphere.

The more youthful ladies and men who be part of radical businesses in the West aren’t performing primarily based on belief; in truth, a maximum of them do no longer have any non-secular historical past or revel in. They are acting due to the reality the narrative and the vision of ISIS or Al-Qaeda contact at the questions of “How do I behave?” and “To who do I belong?” - frequently opposing belonging to the geographical region and belonging to the ummah.

What is the ummah? As a present-day concept, it’s far defined as the worldwide community of Muslim believers. However, until the Muslim imperial encounters with the West, the ummah have become the totality of territories below the authority of the caliphate, which entailed a couple of languages, cultures, and religions (in evaluation to what ISIS declares).


The secular nationalists in Muslim lands were a very small elite who knew that most of the mobilization on the ground against the colonial powers got here from humans for whom Islam, greater than subculture or language, turn out to be the defining characteristic in their political network.

So, although these Westernized elites from Turkey to Iraq or Tunisia have been no longer clearly non-secular believers, they understood that they could not construct a country without incorporating a belonging to Islam in its fundamental shape. Therefore, the postcolonial geographical areas had been mounted as hegemonic Muslim states, wherein Islam exercised a hegemonic impact over the general public sphere.


Hegemonic Islam took place in 3 number one techniques:

  • The nationalization of institutions, clerics, and locations of worship of one unique way of lifestyles of Islam (for example, Sunni over Shi’a);

  • The redefinition and adjustment of sharia to the contemporary criminal tool, in addition to the inclusion of Islamic references into civil regulation (as with marriage and divorce) and criminal regulation, based totally on the prescriptions of that unique brand of Islam;

  • The insertion of the doctrine of that faith into the majority college curriculum past non-secular education, that is, in countrywide statistics textbooks and civic training.

All hegemonic Muslim states have infused the secular state with a few factors of Islamic law and feature followed Islam as the primary regulator of countrywide identification (except Indonesia, Senegal, and Tunisia publish-Jasmine Revolution).


While looking at methods of radicalization, the issue of belonging should be taken seriously. The fewer human beings enjoy as they belong to the mainstream political community, the greater inclined they’re to transnational agencies that provide possibility and superb belongings.

The aspect is that individuals who do violence within the call of true religion aren’t usurpers. Violence in the call of true religion is deeply rooted in non-secular texts and subculture. At the equal time, denouncing people who use God’s name to justify violence additionally has its religious precedents.

Terror and compassion are a part of true religion, according to some. However, according to true religion, what’s normative is predicated upon which strand wins over the hearts and minds of its adherents.

Sign Up to read such interesting blogs directly into your inbox!


Be the First to Expand Your
Intellectual Horizon!

bottom of page